Lawful Behavior and Legal Responsibility

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1007/978-94-6265-711-3_12
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This chapter explores the dual concepts of lawful behavior and legal responsibility as central elements in the regulation of social relations. It begins by defining lawful behavior as conduct aligned with legal norms and examines its types such as marginal, conformist, habitual, and socially active, based on motivation and internalization of legal values. The chapter stresses the role of legal culture and conscious engagement in fostering stable, socially beneficial conduct. The second part analyzes unlawful behavior (offenses), outlining its legal characteristics and structural elements: subject, subjective side (guilt), object, and objective side (harm and causality). It categorizes offenses into criminal, administrative, civil, disciplinary, procedural, and international violations. The final section presents legal responsibility as the coercive response to offenses, detailing its key features, goals, and principles: legality, justice, inevitability, expediency, individualization, guilt-based responsibility, and protection against double jeopardy. Different forms of legal responsibility (criminal, administrative, civil, disciplinary, material) are distinguished by their enforcement mechanisms and legal consequences. The chapter emphasizes that balanced, principled legal responsibility reinforces legal order and encourages voluntary compliance in post-Soviet societies.