Phytochemical Profiling of Inula caspica and Inula britannica Using GC-MS and HPLC-UV-MS: Biotechnological and Therapeutic Insights

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.52711/0974-360x.2026.00033
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Context: Inula caspica F.K. Blum ex Ledeb and Inula britannica L. (Asteraceae) are medicinal plants used in traditional medicine for their therapeutic effects. Despite this, detailed phytochemical studies on these species are scarce, especially concerning their polyphenolic compounds and other bioactive constituents. Objectives: This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive phytochemical analysis of ethanol extracts from I. caspica and I. britannica using advanced chromatographic and spectrometric methods, with the goal of assessing their potential for therapeutic and biotechnological applications. Methods: Aerial parts of both species were collected in Kazakhstan and extracted with 70% ethanol via ultrasound-assisted and percolation methods. Extracts were analyzed using Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) for volatile and semi-volatile compounds, and High-Performance Liquid Chromatography coupled with UV and Mass Spectrometry detection (HPLC-UV-MS) for phenolic acids and flavonoids. Results: GC-MS analysis identified 34 compounds across three extracts, including fatty acids, sesquiterpene lactones, and bioactive aldehydes with reported anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and cytotoxic effects. HPLC-UV-MS profiling revealed 10–11 phenolic constituents, notably chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, rutin, quercetin, cinaroside, luteolin, and kaempferol. Comparative extraction showed both ultrasonic and percolation techniques efficiently recovered phenolics, with chlorogenic acid and cinaroside being dominant. Conclusions: The phytochemical diversity of I. caspica and I. britannica underscores their value as sources of biologically active metabolites. Their rich polyphenolic and flavonoid composition support traditional uses and highlights promising avenues for pharmaceutical and nutraceutical development. Further in vivo validation and standardization are recommended.