Integrated simulation and life cycle assessment of CO 2 to gasoline conversion: reactor level optimization and environmental trade offs

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1515/cppm-2025-0168
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract The conversion of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) into gasoline-range hydrocarbons offers a dual benefit of carbon mitigation and the production of synthetic fuels. This work develops an integrated process simulation and life cycle assessment (LCA) framework for CO 2 -to-gasoline synthesis using Aspen HYSYS, explicitly coupling the Reverse Water Gas Shift (RWGS) and Fischer–Tropsch (FT) pathways. Two RWGS reactor configurations, a Gibbs reactor and a plug-flow reactor (PFR), are modeled and compared based on product yield, energy requirements, and cradle-to-gate environmental performance. The PFR achieves a gasoline output of 314.9 kg h −1 from 1,100 kg h −1 of CO 2 , a 4.3-fold increase relative to the Gibbs reactor, but requires 18.4 % more cold utility and higher hydrogen input. LCA using ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) v1.13 and a functional unit of 1,000 t of CO 2 processed shows that this reactor-level efficiency gain is accompanied by 17 % higher climate-change impacts (31.8 vs. 27.1 million kg CO 2 -eq) and a 4.3-fold increase in human toxicity, driven by electricity use and Ni/Co catalyst production. Photochemical ozone formation and fossil resource depletion are also significantly higher in the PFR case. The study demonstrates that optimizing CO 2 utilization at the reactor level does not automatically minimize life cycle burdens, and highlights the importance of integrating detailed process simulation with LCA when designing CO 2 valorization routes.