Tooth enamel EPR spectroscopy study of radiation doses for uranium miners in Northern Kazakhstan

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/09553002.2025.2609851
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

PURPOSE: In order to estimate the effect of radiation exposure on the workers of a uranium enterprise, teeth samples were collected for EPR dosimetry of tooth enamel from workers of uranium mines living in Shantobe settlement (Akmola region, Northern Kazakhstan) and from residents of this settlement who had never worked in the mine as a control. METHODS: The accumulated radiation doses in enamel were estimated based on the magnitude of the radiation-induced EPR signal in the samples. Excess (additional) doses were obtained after subtracting the contribution of natural radiation at typical levels during enamel age, and they were interpreted as caused by radiation in the work environment and by radioactive contamination of the territory. RESULTS: For the personnel of the uranium mining enterprise (17 teeth samples), the average excess dose was 90 ± 20 mGy (standard uncertainty of the average is indicated here and below). For the rest of the population who did not work at the mine (10 teeth samples), the average excess dose is estimated at 20 ± 12 mGy. CONCLUSIONS: A higher mean dose and greater variation were observed for miners in comparison to non-mining people in the same settlement. These differences were likely due to the occupational exposure.