Active locomotion predictively rescues head direction attractor dynamics in head-fixed mice

2026

Full text Open access: Green Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.64898/2026.01.12.698940
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Head direction (HD) cells in the anterodorsal thalamic nuclei form the brain's internal compass, and are often modeled as a ring attractor maintaining azimuth coding by leveraging continuous visual and inertial sensory input. Here, we test how the common experimental preparation of head-fixed animals alters this code. Complete head-fixation that creates vestibular conflict disrupts both unit and population encoding of head direction, while selectively constraining head-on-body movements either in real or virtual reality uniquely impairs HD population activity. More specifically, attractor dynamics is altered in head-restrained mice during periods of immobility, but remarkably recover several hundred milliseconds prior to locomotion onset. The rescue preceding movement onset suggests that an efference copy or prediction of a re-afferent signal is necessary to maintain HD network activity during head restraint. A computational model recapitulates these effects by perturbing lateral connectivity among HD neurons. More generally, the results indicate that the HD network is a context- and state-dependent predictive estimator, stabilized by forthcoming self-motion signals. The classic ring-attractor models should be revised to integrate context-dependent dynamics with prospective motor signals, offering a more complete account of how the brain's compass remains stable across both naturalistic and constrained conditions.