Methodological framework for pre-service teachers to effectively cultivate a variety of moral skills and values in senior students

Cogent Education, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/2331186x.2025.2607797
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study aimed to construct and evaluate a methodological framework that would allow pre-service teachers to effectively cultivate a variety of moral skills and values in students in Grades 10 and 11 in the Senior Level in Kazakhstan. A total of 72 third- and fourth-year pre-service social educators and educational psychologists enrolled in an elective course and module ‘The Contemporary Moral Education in Kazakhstan’, which consisted of pedagogical and practical components. The course curriculum covered three distinct approaches: teaching through narrative, problem-oriented teaching, and moral competence promotion. The content (i.e. cinematographic, religious, and educational materials) of the course was geared toward interpreting moral values through the prism of selected pedagogies. After taking the course, students were asked to implement one of the suggested approaches during their three-month practicums in schools. The research instrument of the study was the Moral Development Interview Inventory (MDII). The results revealed a significant improvement in the moral development level of children after the intervention (p = 0.002, at p ≤ 0.005). No statistically significant differences were observed between the approaches (p = 0.108, at p ≤ 0.005), indicating that neither was more effective than the other. The present finding may be useful to teachers, secondary and higher educational institutions, parents, instructional designers, and other stakeholders in the field of moral education.