Philosophy of life in the context of neonomadism: traditions and modernity

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.31489/2025hph4/277-286
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article examines neonomadism as a sociocultural and philosophical phenomenon that combines a no-madic lifestyle with the infrastructures of digital capitalism. It analyzes the key motivations for digital no-madism, including the desire for flexibility, freedom, and emancipation from traditional labor relations, as well as the sociopolitical aspects of this phenomenon. The study aims to philosophically reconstruct neonomadism as a form of life (Lebensform), linking it to nomadic traditions and digital technologies; identi-fy its influence on value orientations, social mobility, and labor practices; and outline normative guidelines for policy regarding mobile labor. Using an interdisciplinary approach, this article examines the economic, social, and technological aspects of neonomadism, aiming to identify its philosophical, social, and economic aspects, as well as to understand its role in transforming notions of freedom, boundaries, and self-realization in the context of globalization and the digital economy. The study reveals that neonomadism is becoming not only a tool for professional self-realization but also an important part of the global process of labor transfor-mation, requiring new approaches to regulation and social integration. A philosophical analysis allows us to understand the duality of the phenomenon and establish normative guidelines for mobility policy: supporting autonomy without romanticization, social guarantees without territorialization, and recognizing the nomadic contribution to cultural and economic diversity.