CULTURAL ALLUSIONS IN DIPLOMATIC TRANSLATION: STRATEGIES, MODELS, AND MECHANISMS OF ADAPTATION

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.59102/kufil/2025/iss4pp78-94
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article analyzes the characteristics of the translation process of Chinese cultural classics, and concludes that literary translation in the field of diplomacy needs to be combined with context-adapted translation methods. The translation process of a literary language in a diplomatic context is endowed with an important political task and coloring. Consequently, the principles and methods of traditional literary translation can no longer fully meet the needs of this task, and upgraded standards and translation strategies must be formulated in a diplomatic context based on the peculiarities of cultural and linguistic translation. It is helpful for realizing the tasks of intercultural exchange and communication between countries. As diplomatic translators of the new era, we need to introduce a new complex principle called political equivalence and aesthetic equivalence. In order for the translated text and the source text to have the same political and aesthetic equivalence, it is necessary to accurately convey the true political intentions and political connotations of the speaker and at the same time ensure the literary artistry of the source text. This research finding has both theoretical and practical significance. It not only helps advance research methods based on equivalence and functionality in translation studies, but also contributes to translator training and ensuring the quality of diplomatic translation.