Identification of comparative constructions in the kazakh language using a pattern-based approach

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.47533/2025.1606-146x.4-12
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Opinion mining and sentiment analysis are aimed at extracting valuable necessary information from the raw text and determining the polarity of the text. Comparative opinion mining analyzes opinions that compare two or more entities based on a common feature. The purpose of comparative opinions mining is to extract comparative opinions from the text and identify the objects being compared. First step of identification comparative opinions is extraction comparative constructions. There are presently research papers on sentiment analysis and opinion mining in the Kazakh language. But we were unable to find any work on the comparative opinion mining. The aim of the study is to automate the extraction of comparative constructions in the Kazakh language. In this paper, a pattern based approach was implemented to extract comparative constructions in the Kazakh language.