Decision support for curriculum design in higher education: An application of the MOORA method

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1063/5.0298285
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This research aims to evaluate the curriculum that has been carried out in the previous academic year at a university. The curriculum evaluation process in this research is carried out to assist universities in making decisions to choose alternative course components that are most prioritized to be developed in the next academic year. Alternative data on course components used are learning objectives, learning materials, learning strategies, evaluation of learning outcomes that are commonly used as guidelines for academic lecture activities in higher education academics. The assessment criteria used are basic principles such as relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, and continuity. The method used for decision making is the MOORA method. The results of this study concluded that the most prioritized course component alternative to be developed in the next academic year is alternative A3 (Learning Strategy).