Classification of Combined MLO and CC Mammographic Views Using Vision–Language Models

Journal of Clinical Medicine of Kazakhstan, 2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.23950/jcmk/17449
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths among women globally. Early detection through mammographic screening significantly improves survival rates, but the interpretation of mammograms is time-consuming and requires extensive expertise. Methods: We utilized six publicly available datasets, preprocessing paired craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views into dual-view concatenated images. Three vision-language models (VLMs)—Quantized Qwen2-VL-2B, Quantized SmolVLM (Idefics3-based), and MammoCLIP—were evaluated using two adaptation strategies: full supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and Linear Probing (LP). EfficientNet-B4 served as a CNN baseline. Results: Experiments show that while EfficientNet-B4 achieved the highest F1-score (0.5810), VLMs delivered competitive results with additional report generation capability. MammoCLIP exhibited the best VLM performance (F1 = 0.4755, ROC-AUC = 0.6906) under LP, outperforming general-purpose VLMs, which struggled with recall despite high precision. SmolVLM demonstrated balanced performance under full fine-tuning (F1 = 0.5101, ROC-AUC = 0.6304), indicating strong adaptability in resource-efficient setups. Conclusion: These findings highlight that domain-specific pretraining significantly enhances VLM effectiveness in mammography classification. Beyond classification, VLMs enable structured reporting and interactive decision support, offering promising avenues for clinical integration despite slightly lower predictive performance compared to specialized CNNs.