Criteria for determining authorship of objects created by artificial intelligence

2025

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.46914/2959-4197-2025-1-4-154-165
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Modern artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are creating new challenges for the legal regulation of authorship of works created with their participation. This study is devoted to the analysis of legal criteria for determining authorship created with the help of AI, in the context of Kazakh and international legislation. The purpose of the study is to develop and substantiate the legal criteria determining the authorship of works created using AI, in order to ensure their legal regulation within the framework of Kazakh legislation and harmonization with international standards. Special attention is paid to the criteria for determining authorship, such as creativity, originality, intellectual contribution of a person and the degree of autonomy of AI in the process of creating a work. The study analyzes the traditional concepts of creativity, originality and novelty applied to works created by AI. The scientific significance of the work lies in the systematization of approaches to the legal regulation of AI works with an emphasis on clarifying the criteria of creativity and originality, as well as in developing conceptual frameworks for their integration into the national legal system. The practical significance of the research is determined by the need to form a uniform practice of applying copyright norms in the context of digitalization.