Leveraging the pedagogical nexus in CLIL professional development

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/07908318.2025.2607090
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) is promoted globally to enhance subject knowledge and language learning, yet professional development (PD) often overlooks teachers’ cultural insights and pedagogical expertise, creating a gap between policy and classroom realities. In Kazakhstan, top-down CLIL reforms risk marginalising teachers’ voices and reproducing one-size-fits-all approaches. This paper reports on a 45-hour PD programme for biology teachers designed around the pedagogical nexus and Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) to examine how culturally and linguistically responsive PD can contribute to CLIL practice. Using a qualitative case study design, we analysed journals, interviews, peer reflections, and lesson documents from 11 biology teachers. Findings show three interrelated shifts: teachers developed a new understanding of the language of science, reimagined their pedagogy to integrate language with content, and adapted CLIL practice through translanguaging, post-Soviet traditions, and cultural values of teaching. These shifts highlight how pedagogical habitus shaped teachers’ engagement with PD. The study contributes a context-sensitive CLIL PD model that foregrounds teacher expertise and demonstrates how locally grounded initiatives can strengthen reform in Kazakhstan and other multilingual settings.