REGIONAL AND LOCAL JOURNALS IN THE ACADEMIC ECOSYSTEM

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.47316/cajmhe.2025.6.4.01
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The increasing centralization of scientific publishing has forced high-impact journals to emphasize globally accessible research, potentially diminishing the visibility of findings that hold significance in a local context. In regions characterized by substantial historical, cultural, and socioeconomic diversity, such as Central Asia, regional journals provide a complementary role in maintaining the continuity and contextual depth of academic knowledge. In this context, by exemplifying Türkiye’s transformation in scientific publishing, it is highlighted that English-language publishing, international indexing, and the development of editorial standards can strengthen, rather than weaken, local academic production. Moreover, critical concerns include preventing errors and retractions in regional journals, reducing the risk of publication ethical breaches, enhancing peer-review procedures, and reducing dependence on commercial editorial agencies. Incorporating training in editorial procedures, academic writing, publication ethics, and digital literacy during the early phases of a career is essential for fostering a sustainable publishing culture. Consequently, regional journals should be regarded not as secondary aspects of the global academic framework but as essential constituents that maintain the diversity of knowledge and contextual integrity.