A critical legal analysis of General Comment No. 4 on Article 24 (Education) of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with disabilities

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.31489/2025l4/40-49
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article examines the international and national legal frameworks governing the right to inclusive education, with a particular focus on the interpretation and application of Article 24 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The objective of the study is to examine the nature and scope of state’s legal obligations. The study adopts a comparative legal analysis and interpretation of international legal documentation, with a particular emphasis on General Comment No. 4 of the Committee on the rights of persons with disabilities. The study identifies legal and practical contradictions, particularly with regard to the transformation of special educational institutions and the role of parents in choosing their child’s educational form. The findings of the study provide substantiation for the perspective that inclusive education ought to be recognised not solely as a pedagogical or social paradigm but also as an individual right. The article concludes with a recommendation that inclusive and special education should be legally coordinated, and that learning environment should be created in the best interests of the child. Inclusion should be conceptualised as a complementary component of an integrated education system, rather than a complete replacement for special education.