Methodological Basis of the Subject «Patriotic History»: Classical Approaches to Innovation (to Bachelors of Non-profile Universities)

2022

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.52209/1609-1825_2022_4_312
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article is devoted to philosophical comprehension of teaching historical disciplines in non-profile universities in the context of formation of historical knowledge as the basis of national identity of modern youth. It is shown that the replacement of the academic discipline «History of Kazakhstan» with «Modern History of Kazakhstan» plays a dual role:on the one hand, the standard approach in the academic discipline does not develop creative thinking; on the other hand, the factual material based on political education does not contribute to the activation of historical thinking. Besides, globalization, the world wide web, and many other factors influence the marginalization of consciousness. The authors actualize the updating of the concept in this area, with the need to improve the changes in the academic discipline. One of the authors of Nugman B.G. offers the author's version of the academic discipline with explanations