Risk Assessment and Outcome Prediction in Pulmonary Embolism

Innovative medicine of Kuban, 2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.35401/2541-9897-2025-10-4-129-135
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Timely diagnosis and treatment can improve both survival rates and the long-term quality of life in patients. The pre-test probability stratification for pulmonary embolism enables the exclusion of diagnostic methods associated with potential complications due to both radiation exposure and contrast agent administration. The article presents scales for assessing the probability of pulmonary embolism, the risk of complications, adverse outcomes, and recurrence of thromboembolism. The advantages and disadvantages of the presented scales for practical use are discussed, along with specific considerations for their use in different patient groups.