Comparative Analysis of Forecasting Models for Student Enrollment in Kazakhstan's General Secondary Education System

2025

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.31489/2025ec4/1200
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

We compared seven forecasting models to predict student enrollment in Kazakhstan's schools using data from 2020-2024. We tested cohort component models, cohort survival models, trend regression with demographic factors, linear trend models, exponential smoothing, multi-factor regression, and weighted moving averages across 20 regions (17 regions and 3 cities) with about 3.9 million students. We measured how accurate each model was using Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). We trained models on 2020-2023 data and tested them on 2024 numbers. The linear trend model worked best, with 0.70% MAPE nationally and 0.77% MAPE across regions. Demographic models didn't work as well—cohort models did poorly at the regional level even though they have good theory behind them. Our forecasts for 2025-2027 show national enrollment growing from 3.9 million to 4.2 million students, but growth varies a lot by region. Big cities like Astana will grow 24.05% and Almaty 12.81%, while some regions will barely grow at all. Our results help educational planners pick the right forecasting methods for different areas. This study fills a research gap for post-Soviet countries where detailed forecasting evaluations are hard to find.