Enhancing Kazakhstani Students’ IELTS Writing Task 2 preparation through the Miro Board

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2025.10.222
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This paper explores the implementation of Miro, a collaborative online whiteboard platform, as an interactive teaching tool for preparing Kazakhstani students for IELTS Writing Task 2. Within the framework of a dedicated IELTS course, Miro is used to support the development of students’ critical thinking, brainstorming, and essay-structuring skills. The study involved two groups of students (15 students each). The group that regularly used Miro for Writing Task 2 showed statistically important improvements in writing skills on the final test—especially in terms of task achievement and coherence and cohesion (p < .01, large effect sizes) —compared to the group that did not use Miro during their preparation. In addition, the study outlines how Miro enhances learner engagement and promotes peer collaboration during the process of generating ideas, outlining essays, and receiving targeted feedback. Preliminary findings suggest that the visual and collaborative features of Miro help students overcome common challenges in coherence and cohesion and increase their overall confidence in academic writing. Implications for language instruction and IELTS test preparation in the Kazakhstani context are discussed, along with recommendations for further research into technology-assisted writing pedagogy.