АУДАРМАТАНУДАҒЫ КОГНИТИВТІ МОДЕЛЬДЕР

2021

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.48371/phils.2021.60.1.007
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article provides a brief analysis of the system representation of the cognitive side of the language based on the material of primary and secondary texts. The nominative fields of nuclear concepts and political topics are considered. The results of the study include an appeal to the nominative field as an environment that determines the choice of translation units.