Technology Integration in Geometry Instruction: SEM Analysis of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Perspectives and Experiences

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.46303/jcsr.2025.21
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study aims to examine pre-service mathematics teachers’ perceptions, experiences, and challenges related to using digital tools in geometry education. A total of 229 pre-service teachers participated, most of whom were female (69.2%), under 20 years old (81.7%), and enrolled in bachelor’s-level mathematics education programs (91.7%). Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to examine relationships among factors affecting the effectiveness and pedagogical integration of digital tools in teaching geometry. Results showed significant positive relationships between engagement and motivation, usability and accessibility, and future training and support needs with both learning and teaching effectiveness, as well as pedagogical integration strategies. Surprisingly, reported challenges and barriers did not significantly impact these outcomes, suggesting greater technological proficiency among newer generations or improved usability of digital tools. These findings highlight the importance of motivation, accessible technology, and targeted professional development in supporting effective integration of digital tools into geometry instruction. Implications for teacher education programs and recommendations for future research are discussed.