ENGLISH AS A MEDIUM OF INSTRUCTION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: OVERVIEW OF ACADEMIC POLICIES IN KAZAKHSTANI UNIVERSITIES

2024

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.48371/peds.2024.72.1.013
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

In order to align with the requirements of the Bologna declaration and to successfully integrate into the European Higher Education Area, the Kazakhstani government started the rapid implementation of English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) in the educational sector all over the country. This research paper aims to present a comprehensive overview of the academic policies surrounding the implementation of EMI in Kazakhstani higher education, specifically in 11 universities with full and partial EMI. EMI is considered to be an instrument that helps universities achieve their internationalization goals, such as student and faculty mobility, research collaboration, international ranking. The study employs content analysis of publicly available institutional policies and university official websites as a research method. It was found that while some Kazakhstani universities with EMI programs have defined clear institutional policies, regarding the internationalization processes, language requirements for admission, availability of language support for students, and internationalized curricula, others do not provide essential information on these processes. Overall, the document analysis revealed the deficiency of proper policy support that might hinder the effectiveness of EMI provision. Thus, the findings offer some important insights into how EMI implementation processes are reflected in the institutional academic policies and emphasize the need and urgency of addressing the revealed gaps to make the process beneficial for all stakeholders.