Abstract
Research objective . To conduct a comparative analysis of logistics risks in Kazakhstan and the USA, identifying key vulnerabilities, assessing their impact on supply chains, and developing specialized risk management strategies. Methodology . A mixed-method approach was used: quantitative analysis (World Bank LPI, trade statistics) and qualitative expert interviews. Applied SWOT analysis, risk mapping, and comparative assessment. Theoretical framework includes Sheffi (2022), ADB/WTO reports, state programs ("Nurly Zhol"). Originality/value . A comparative risk matrix for differently developed economies was created. Practical significance is evidenced by calculations: $2.1B rail gauge standardization reduces delays by 30%; NIST compliance cuts cyber incidents by 70%. Results . Structural disparities were identified: - Kazakhstan: infrastructure gaps (22% roads meet standards), geopolitical risks (68% EU transit via Russia); - USA: cyber threats ($4.3M damage/incident), climate risks ($18B annual losses). Priority solutions: for KZ – developing "Middle Corridor", for USA – port cybersecurity. This study contributes to the existing body of knowledge by providing a comparative analysis of logistical risk factors in different economic contexts (notably Kazakhstan and the USA) and proposing a novel integrated theoretical and methodological framework for risk assessment and management tailored for industrial enterprises.