Silicon Carbide Ceramics for Armor Applications: A Review of Sintering Methods and Additive Systems

Molecules, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/molecules31071185
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Silicon carbide (SiC) ceramics are among the most attractive materials for lightweight armor because they combine low density (3.0–3.2 g/cm3), high hardness, and high thermal and chemical stability; however, their densification remains challenging because of strong covalent bonding and low self-diffusion. This review analyzes the main sintering routes used for armor-grade SiC ceramics, including solid-state sintering, liquid-phase sintering, hot pressing, gas-pressure sintering, hot-isostatic pressing, ultra-high-pressure sintering, two-step sintering, and spark plasma sintering, together with additive systems based on B, C, Al2O3, Y2O3, MgO, CaO, and rare-earth oxides. Reported data show that solid-state sintering typically requires 2100–2300 °C and yields 90–95% relative density, whereas hot pressing and liquid-phase sintering achieve 96–99% density at lower temperatures, generally with a flexural strength of 350–800 MPa, fracture toughness of 3.5–7.0 MPa·m1/2, and hardness of 20–30 GPa. Among the reviewed methods, spark plasma sintering provides near-theoretical density (≥99%) together with the most favorable combination of strength (up to 850 MPa) and hardness (up to 35 GPa). Overall, liquid-phase sintering and spark plasma sintering offer the most favorable balance between densification, microstructural control, and armor-relevant mechanical performance.