The Influence of Planting Density and Climatic Variables on the Wood Structure of Siberian Spruce and Scots Pine

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/f16111622
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Stand density is one among a multitude of factors impacting the growth of trees and their responses to climatic variables, but its effect on wood quality at the scale of anatomical structure is hardly investigated. Therefore, we analyzed the radial growth and wood structure of Siberian spruce (Picea obovata Ledeb.) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in an experimental conifer plantation with a wide gradient of stand density in the Siberian southern taiga. The measured and indexed chronologies of the tree-ring width (TRW), number of tracheid cells per radial row in the ring produced in the cambial zone (N), cell radial diameter (D), and cell wall thickness (CWT) demonstrated the influence of the planting density. The TRW and N have a negative allometric dependence on the stand density (R2 = 0.75–0.88), likely due to competition for resources. The consistent negative dependence of the D on the stand density (R2 = 0.85–0.97) is log-linear and also seems to be related to tree size, while the CWT is not significantly dependent on the stand density. These findings can be used as insights in regulating cellular structure and procuring desired wood quality by silvicultural means. Both conifer species have similar climatic reactions. We observed significant suppression of TRW and D related to water deficit in May–July (both species), as well as frosty (more for pine) and low-snow (for spruce) conditions in winters, as shown by both dendroclimatic correlation and pointer year analysis. Temporal shifts in the climatic responses indicate later transition to latewood and growth cessation in sparse stands, especially in spruce. Better performance was observed in sparce and medium-density stands for both species.