The Sacred and Ethnocultural Code of Kazakh Jewelry Chrematonyms

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.32523/2616-6887-2025-152-3-348-362
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article explores the names of jewelry items, their mythic-semantic meanings and interpretations, thematic-lexical categories, and usage peculiarities. At the intersection of language and culture, it is crucial to uncover the inner essence, cultural semantics, and sacred-pragmatic significance of archetypal, mythical, and symbolic linguocultural units related to the art of jewelry. Jewelry encodes standards, stereotypes, and symbols that reflect national spirit through metaphors preserved in paremio­logical and phraseological systems. These culturally marked elements are transmitted from generation to generation, revealing the spiritual worldview of the Kazakh people. The study aims to decode the ethnocultural meanings embedded in women’s adornmentssuch as bracelets (bilezik), facial beads (betmonshak), rings (zhuzik, sakinа), pendants (zhyrga), earrings (syrga), buttons (tuyme), hair ornaments (shashbau), and decorative chains (sholpy, shytyra)through data preserved in phraseology and paremiology. These jewelry items are not only indicators of beauty or wealth but also serve as ritualistic, mythical-sacred, and functional objects, with their traditional use, age-specific variations, and practical applications considered key subjects of study. Additionally, jewelry is examined as a historical source, with attention to its functional meanings, regional features, and distinctions based on age.