A comparative study of occasionalism translation in Russian and Kazakh languages: a case analysis of J.K. Rowling’s “Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone”

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.31489/2025ph2/40-54
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of English occasionalisms in J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone and their translations into Kazakh and Russian. Occasionalisms — words coined by the author for a specific context — are a unique linguistic phenomenon that pose significant challenges for trans[1]lators due to their novelty and lack of fixed equivalents. Successful translation of these neologisms demands not only linguistic competence but also creative flexibility in applying various translation strategies appropri[1]ate to the context. The study focuses on translations published by “Rosman” (2007) in Russian and “Steppe & World” (2022) in Kazakh. It explores the most frequently used techniques for rendering occasionalisms and examines how these choices affect the overall interpretation of the text. The analysis reveals that translitera[1]tion and transcription are the most commonly employed strategies in both translations. These methods often preserve the phonetic or visual features of the original terms, maintaining the whimsical and imaginative tone of the source text. To support the analysis, the article includes tables and charts that clearly illustrate the fre[1]quency and application of various translation techniques. It highlights similarities and differences between the English source text and its Russian and Kazakh counterparts, shedding light on how cultural and linguistic factors influence the translation process. The findings contribute meaningfully to the field of translation stud[1]ies, particularly in the context of children's literature. They offer valuable insights into the challenges of trans[1]lating creative language across diverse linguistic landscapes. Moreover, the research provides a useful foun[1]dation for future comparative studies involving English, Russian, and Kazakh translations, as well as practical guidance for translators working with imaginative and child-oriented texts.