Abstract
This article provides an in-depth analysis of the phenomenon of reminiscence, which is considered one of the forms of intertextuality in literary texts. Reminiscence is examined as a means of referencing other works, reviving certain literary traditions, and establishing a textual dialogue. The study compares and contrasts the similarities and differences between reminiscence and allusion, identifying the semantic and aesthetic functions of reminiscence in literary works. The article analyzes various definitions of the term “reminiscence” provided by different literary scholars and linguists and explores its connection with intertextuality theory. Relying on the works of scholars such as Julia Kristeva, Mikhail Bakhtin, Roland Barthes, and V.E. Khalizev, the role of reminiscence in literary texts is considered. In addition, the research draws upon Professor A.S. Adilova’s conclusions regarding the types of intertextuality and the specific features of reminiscence in literary texts. Throughout the study, literary analysis, comparative method, hermeneutic, and intertextual approaches are employed. Each method contributes to a deeper exploration of the function of reminiscence in literary works and helps to clarify its semantic features. Furthermore, the article examines specific examples of reminiscence drawn from Rakhymzhan Otarbaev’s novel Bas, Mukhtar Magauin’s Kypchak Beauty, and E. Tursynov’s Mamluk. Additionally, the article introduces a new term — “reautor-reminiscence”. While “autor-reminiscence” refers to an author’s reference to their previous works within a literary text, “reautorreminiscence” is proposed as a concept referring to the author’s reference to the very work they are currently writing. This concept is substantiated and clarified through examples from literary texts. The research highlights that reminiscence demonstrates the author’s connection with the literary traditions of their era, contributes to the multi-layered structure of the literary text, and enhances the reader’s creative perception and comprehensive understanding of the text. The article demonstrates the function of reminiscence in deepening the content of a literary work, strengthening the connections between texts, and complicating the reader’s perception. The author conducts a comprehensive study of the phenomenon of reminiscence, aiming to determine its place in literary creativity. This research contributes to the understanding of intertextual phenomena and reveals the significance of reminiscence in contemporary literary studies.