COGNITIVE-PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF TERMS: A CASE STUDY

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.48371/phils.2025.3.78.030
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The translation of specialized terms demands precise adherence to target audience discourse rules and appropriate equivalent selection. Dictionaries often provide multiple equivalents, causing translation challenges.This study investigates the application of cognitive-pragmatic analysis to common terms borrowed from the trilingual explanatory dictionary of petroleum geology, “Mұнай және газ геологиясы терминдерінің түсіндірме сөздігі”, edited by T.N.Zhumagaliyev and B.M.Kuandykov. The research focuses on “берег” (bereg) and “болото” (boloto), terms frequently used in various discourses. The study aims to identify semantic differences between their English equivalents and analyze their pragmatic impact on the recipient. The study employs cognitive-pragmatic approach to analyze sentences generated by artificial intelligence to identify semantic nuances and pragmatic implications.This research seeks to identify semantic differences between English equivalents’ meanings for terms “берег” and “болото”. The study uses pragmatic perception of these equivalents for recipients and develops practical recommendations for their usage as well as for translators of special texts. The study contributes to translation studies by advancing understanding of cognitive-pragmatic analysis and provides tools for translators in selecting appropriate equivalents which leads to translation accuracy. The research reveals that even common terms can have varying meanings in specialized contexts. Cognitive-pragmatic analysis helps uncover these nuances and provides guidelines for working with equivalents.The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of cognitive-pragmatic analysis in addressing challenges related to term equivalence in specialized translation. It offers practical recommendations for translators and contributes to the theoretical foundations of translation studies.