ЖАЛПЫ ОРТА БІЛІМ МЕКЕМЕЛЕРІНДЕ ШЕШЕНДІК ӨНЕР ПӘНІНІҢ ОҚЫТЫЛУ ЖАЙЫ

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.62724/202530308
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article examines the issues of the history of the formation of the methodology of teaching rhetoric in educational institutions, as well as the state of teaching rhetoric to students of Kazakhstani schools. The author expresses the opinion that the formation of rhetoric as an academic subject of educational institutions at all times occurred according to certain patterns. The article also provides informative information about the teaching of rhetoric in Kazakh schools. The author argues that despite the various names of the subject and forms of teaching rhetoric, the introduction of rhetoric in general education institutions is always caused by high demand from society. The author provides evidence that the practice of teaching public speaking in secondary schools has not fully become the subject of theoretical and methodological analysis (systematization of teaching methods and tools, scientific justification for the selection of didactic material, examination of the exercise system, etc.), which, in turn, leads to a decrease in the effectiveness of classes, to deterioration the quality of knowledge In conclusion, the author notes that the practice of teaching rhetoric (oratory) in secondary school (systematization of teaching methods and tools, scientific justification for the selection of didactic material, examination of the exercise system, etc.) needs a full-fledged theoretical justification.