Child adoption in civil proceedings of the Republic of Kazakhstan: scientific and legal analysis

2025

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.46914/2959-4197-2025-1-3-71-78
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive legal and scientific analysis of the institution of adoption within the civil proceedings system of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Adoption is considered not only as a legal act that establishes kinship between the adopter and the child but also as a form of social adaptation for minors left without parental care. The study covers both substantive and procedural aspects of adoption, which is conducted exclusively through court proceedings within the framework of special procedure. Based on the analysis of current legislation, judicial practice, statistical data from 2020 to 2024, and academic sources, the article identifies key issues related to adoption, including cases of fictitious adoption. Special attention is paid to the legal status of interested parties, classification of contentious situations, and legislative gaps concerning the invalidation of adoption decisions. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the formulation of an original concept of fictitious adoption as an independent ground for declaring an adoption invalid. The authors propose concrete measures to improve the current legislation: introducing a specific article into the Code «On Marriage and Family», clarifying the powers of interested parties, and regulating post adoption monitoring procedures. The article concludes with the necessity of comprehensive legislative reform to strengthen judicial oversight, protect children’s rights, and prevent misuse of the adoption system.