SCORING CARDS FOR DIFFERENT TYPES OF CREDIT PRODUCTS

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.55452/1998-6688-2025-22-3-98-109
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The development of credit scoring is one of the key topics of attention in credit risk management in financial companies. However, a single approach to produce rating cards is frequently worthless since loan products differ in risk and financing time and often there is insufficient information on borrowers. The paper addresses the features of creating score cards for consumer credit, refinancing, small and medium businesses, auto loans, mortgage loans, fintech and P2P lending. Thus, the present work can be considered as the above comparative analysis of the most important elements influencing the probability of default of the borrower in the settlement by segments, together with the consideration of machine learning techniques and the use of alternative data sources that can improve the accuracy of the forecast. Depending on the usual credit product, the analysis lets one create recommendations for choosing the optimal approach of creating scoring cards, so enhancing the accuracy of the borrower’s creditworthiness projection and reducing the degree of default risk.