THE STATUS OF LOCAL REPRESENTATIVE BODIES IN KAZAKHSTAN AND OTHER POST-SOVIET COUNTRIES THAT STEPPED ON THE PATH TO DECENTRALIZATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

2025

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.52152/801452
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study aims to explore the similarities and differences between the status and powers of local representative bodies in Kazakhstan and two other post-Soviet countries– Ukraine and Georgia. The findings will make it easier to grasp the challenges that Kazakhstan faces when building an effective system of local self-government. The results show that despite the shared post-Soviet past, the studied countries have chosen different trajectories for decentralization and have been implementing their reforms at different pace. The instruments to promote citizens’ participation have been formalized in all three countries, creating the necessary foundation to further decentralization efforts.