Study of the spatial variability of soil properties using interpolation methods

E3S Web of Conferences, 2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/202564801011
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Reliable geotechnical modeling is essential for safe foundation design, especially under sparse borehole data conditions common in urban construction. This study compares three spatial interpolation methods - Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW), ordinary Kriging, and Empirical Bayesian Kriging (EBK 3D) - for predicting key soil parameters (cohesion c, friction angle φ, and deformation modulus E) at a site in Astana, Kazakhstan. EBK 3D demonstrated superior performance in terms of spatial consistency and statistical stability. Specifically, EBK 3D yielded the lowest coefficients of variation: 0.167% for cohesion, 0.004% for friction angle, and 0.019% for deformation modulus. These results confirm EBK 3D’s suitability for accurate soil property estimation in data-limited and geologically complex environments.