Transport connectivity as a factor in Central Asia’s cross-border cooperation

Pathways to Peace and Security, 2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.20542/2307-1494-2025-1-106-118
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article examines the role of transport connectivity in the development of cross-border cooperation among the Central Asian countries. It begins by noting the Eurocentric nature of existing research in this area and highlights the distinctiveness of the Central Asian context characterized by authoritarian political centralization, landlocked geography, a prominent role of transit, and rapid demographic growth in many border areas. The study emphasizes that physical proximity does not guarantee the intensity of cooperation between neighboring territories – partly due to natural barriers such as deserts in the west and mountains in the east that limit cooperation in large parts of the region. The most intensive cross-border cooperation is observed in two areas: between parts of Kazakhstan’s Turkestan and Zhambyl provinces and adjacent territories of Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan, respectively, as well as in the Fergana Valley. Strong functional cross-border linkages between major cities – such as Tashkent and Shymkent, or Almaty and Bishkek – also foster cooperation beyond what might be expected based on geographical distance alone. Central Asian states have initiated efforts to develop new transport corridors and build logistics hubs at their borders, aiming to support both intraregional and interregional connectivity. However, these efforts remain limited in scale and have not yet produced substantial results.