Deep Learning with Multi-Head Attention for Respiratory Sound Analysis

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/sist61657.2025.11139201
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This paper explores the performances of deep learning algorithms architectures for classification of breath sounds in automated diagnosis of breathing diseases. The investigation encompasses three convolutional neural frameworks: a baseline convolutional network, a bidirectional recurrent convolutional architecture, and an augmented version incorporating a combination multi-head self-attention mechanism. The systems were developed and validated using a publicly available dataset containing respiratory sound recordings from individuals with various pulmonary disorders. Gaussian noise amplification and a class-weighted loss function are applied to remove class imbalance. All three architectures configurations have similar convolutional fronts but differ in bidirectional processing and the inclusion of an attention block with residual reinforcement. While all configurations share a common convolutional backbone, they diverge in their temporal modeling capabilities specifically in bidirectional sequence handling and attention integration. Notably, the attention-augmented model demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy (93.8%), surpassing both the recurrent (91.5%) and base convolutional (89.2%) counterparts. Despite this advancement, differentiating between pneumonia and COPD remains problematic due to acoustic similarities.