Ties that bind? Women leaders’ voting congruence in the United Nations General Assembly

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1177/00471178251361729
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Does the gender of political leaders shape a country’s foreign policy? Some suggest that women leaders are more likely to express similar foreign policy preferences with other women leaders, while others suggest that gender has negligible or no influence on leaders’ foreign policy preferences. We argue that women leaders, specifically state legislators and chief executives, show distinctive foreign policy positions. Our analysis of voting records in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), one of the principal organs and the primary policy-making body of the United Nations (UN), lends strong empirical evidence to the assertion that the gender of politicians greatly shapes states’ foreign policy. We further find that this congruence between women leaders holds true regardless of the region and the regime type they represent. These findings suggest that as more states strive to increase women’s representation in the UNGA, corresponding shifts in their foreign policy orientations are likely to follow.