Formation of students' written scientific speech in chemistry: A comparative study of scaffolding strategies

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.53894/ijirss.v8i5.9371
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The development of scientific writing in school chemistry represents a crucial direction in modern pedagogy, aimed at fostering students’ skills in academic argumentation, meaningful structuring of knowledge, and subject-specific language literacy. In this study, we examine various scaffold strategies (cognitive, linguistic, and hybrid) and propose an original model, SWC (Scientific Writing in Chemistry), which integrates pedagogical and cognitive mechanisms for the formation of scientific writing. Our model is based on a seven-step scaffold support algorithm and combines genre-based, process-oriented, and content-language approaches. A comparative theoretical study has been conducted with visual and tabular verification of the SWC model’s effectiveness across key parameters: cognitive load, language support, scientific accuracy, and cross-disciplinarity. We present algorithms, task templates, methodological guidelines, and a risk table. Our findings demonstrate that SWC is a pedagogically balanced and functional model for developing scientific writing in the context of chemistry education.