Classifier Performance on Long‐Tail Distributions

2025

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1002/sam.70037
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper introduces a Gaussian mixture model designed to explore the implications of long‐tailedness on classification performance. Our study reveals that simple under‐specified classifiers are inherently limited in reducing generalization error within this framework, a limitation overcome by well‐specified and even more complex over‐specified classifiers capable of fitting rare examples. Through theoretical analysis and empirical evaluation on both synthetic and real datasets, we demonstrate how the performance gap between under‐specified and well/over‐specified classifiers varies with changes in the tail length of the distribution. Our results validate the necessity of fitting rare instances in training datasets to achieve enhanced generalization capabilities in models faced with long‐tail distributed data.