A Comparative Performance Analysis of Diverse Task Scheduling Algorithms for Cloud Computing

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/icint65528.2025.11030905
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Task scheduling is a critical component in cloud computing, directly impacting the efficiency and performance of cloud environments. This paper presents a comparative performance analysis of four task scheduling algorithms: a hybrid credit-based resource-aware load balancing algorithm (HO-CB-RALB-SA), a conventional load balancing algorithm, an enhanced load balancing algorithm, and a locust-inspired algorithm. The hybrid approach integrates the Walrus Optimisation Algorithm (WOA) and Lyrebird Optimisation Algorithm (LOA), while the other algorithms represent nature-inspired and heuristic techniques. The evaluation focuses on three key metrics: makespan, resource utilisation, and balance percentage. By analysing these algorithms, the study identifies the strengths and limitations of each approach, providing insights into their effectiveness for cloud task scheduling. The results contribute to the selection and optimisation of task scheduling strategies tailored to diverse cloud computing needs and increase user satisfaction.