Frame Representation of Medical Terminological System in Kazakh and English

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.30564/fls.v7i5.9233
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This work is motivated by the growing interest in cognitive linguistics and the ways in which we understand the world and perceive extralinguistic reality, particularly in the context of medical terminology. The aim of this article is to conduct a comprehensive study of the medical terminology in both English and Kazakh, highlighting the connections between the frames within the field of medicine as reflected in these two languages. To model the medical terminological system, we employed the frame method, which is well-established in both Kazakh and foreign linguistics. Additionally, we utilized a theoretical approach and comparative analysis to examine the medical terms in English and Kazakh. The article addresses the development of the medical terminology system while considering contemporary aspects of cognitive linguistics. We constructed a frame scheme based on linguistic data from both languages, identifying the main macrocategories, subframes, and slots within the medical terminological system. We drew parallels between the linguistic and lexico-semantic completeness of the subframes and slots through examples from dictionary entries in Kazakh and English, and we established relationships among terminology used across different medical fields. The findings presented in this study can serve as a foundation for optimizing and systematizing the terminological systems of national languages, particularly in the realm of medical terminology.