Creation and Accessibility of Personal Funds in Archives: Kazakh and Foreign Experience

Historia i Świat, 2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.34739/his.2025.14.19
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article reviews and analyzes the collection experience and methodology for the formation of personal funds and access to them in the archives of Kazakhstan, Poland and Russia. The purpose of the study is to study the experience of Kazakhstan, Russia and Poland in the collection, formation of archival personal funds and access to them. The article was written using extensive literature - unpublished archival documents, regulatory legal acts and methodological documents. The research methodology is based on an integrated approach using historical-descriptive, content analysis, and comparative methods. Results: Personal documents, along with official documents, replenishing and enriching state archival funds are the source base for research. The complex of personal documents created as a result of human life and activity forms an archival personal fund in the future. Being an important part of any archive, personal funds are varied and multifaceted in their content and significance. Personal funds contain unique and valuable documents varying in composition and content about the life and activities of government and political figures, heroes, workers, poets, representatives of culture and art, artists, art historians and scientists. In studying the experience of Kazakhstan, Russia and Poland, this paper reveals their differences in terms used in the archival sphere. Moreover, common features and peculiarities in the methodology for creating personal funds have been identified, and their composition has been determined. We have considered the issues of access to archival personal funds in three countries and identified their features.