Cross-linguistic Equivalence and Expressiveness of Proverbs

2025

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.55491/2411-6076-2025-2-64-74
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Proverbs are essential expressions that encapsulate folk wisdom, showcase the beauty of language and life, and enrich the spirit of the language. This paper discusses common and specific features of equivalent proverbs in Kazakh, English, Russian, and Uighur. A logical question arises: why were these languages chosen for analysis? In a globalized world, immigration is a significant trend in many countries, and Kazakhstan is no exception. Many English-and-Uighur speaking immigrants live in Kazakhstan today. Furthermore, Kazakhstan was part of the Soviet Union for 70 years and gained independence only in 1991, so, there are many Russians and people of other nationalities who speak Russian in the country. The scientific works of Mati Kuusi, G.Permyakov, E.Kokare, N.Pazyak, A.V. Kunin, A.Qaidar, N.Issanbat, A.Nurmakhanov served as the methodological basis for this research on proverbs. A comparative and semantic analysis were conducted in the research to define similarities and differences of proverbs. This paper will contribute both theoretically and practically. The findings of this research can be applied theoretically in further studies on cultural linguistics, literature and folklore. Additionally, students and immigrants can compare and contrast proverbs and practically apply them to various linguistic contexts and use the findings in academic research and publication activities. Due to the comparative study of Kazakh, English, Russian, and Uighur proverbs, we argue that Kazakh, Russian and Uighur proverbs are partially or highly similar in their lexical composition and grammatical structure and coincide in their functional, semantic, and affectively expressive features. However, English proverbs differ in their grammatical structures, although their semantic content largely shares common features with these other languages.