LEADERSHIP IN LABORATORY MEDICINE AS THE KEY QUALITY TOOL

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26212/2227-1937.2025.49.37.024
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The effectiveness of medical laboratory activity is largely determined by the ability of employees to find the root cause in complex situations, to make a non-trivial decision, which will ultimately provide clinicians with objective data, contributing to the confidence of clinicians in the results of laboratory research, as well as favorably affect the further introduction and development of diagnostic technologies, which will positively affect the process of diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of patients. In turn, one of the factors that ensures the competence of medical laboratory workers is the leadership qualities of their managers, whose decisions create the most adequate conditions for the effective functioning of laboratories. Objective. To analyze and determine the role of leaders and the significance of leadership in medical laboratories in Kazakhstan and other countries as one of the vectors of development of laboratory medicine. Materials and Methods. Performed a comprehensive search of all relevant literature within electronic platforms such as Semantic Scholar, Science Direct, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and Web of Science using the keywords; «quality control leadership», «laboratory management», «leadership development», «laboratory manager skills», «quality manager training», “Kazakhstan», “clinical laboratory leadership» and «laboratory leadership challenges”. The search was conducted for English-language publications spanning from 2001 up to 2025 to include previous publications and contemporary practice. Results: For this study, 138 publications were reviewed for their relevance to leadership in medical laboratories, specifically in Kazakhstan. Topics examined included roles and responsibilities of laboratory managers, leadership and management, as well as leadership traits, skills, and leadership styles. In addition, challenges in laboratory services and standards that define good leadership in medical laboratories were reviewed. Selected leadership practices used by heads of medical laboratories and quality control managers in Kazakhstan were reviewed along with international standards and accreditation bodies along with their guidelines. A comparative analysis of leadership styles of medical laboratory managers and quality control managers in Kazakhstan and other countries reveals its unique dimensions. Discussion. Modern development of laboratory medicine requires managers not only to have technical competence, but also high leadership qualities. International organizations such as IFCC, WHO, CDC and others are developing training programs and guidelines aimed at developing managerial competencies in medical laboratories. Particular attention is paid to the implementation of flexible training models, mentoring and development of strategic thinking, business skills and clinical bioanalytics. Leadership development is considered as a process accessible to every specialist and includes formal education, practice, mentoring and self-reflection. Effective leadership development programs include an individual approach, on-the-job training, certification and participation in professional communities. As a result, laboratories that invest in the development of leadership competencies ensure sustainable quality of diagnostics and improved patient safety. Conclusion. This review highlights the critical role of effective leadership in modern laboratory medicine. Strong leadership is essential for ensuring efficiency, innovation, and positive patient outcomes. Without visionary and ethical leaders, laboratories risk stagnation and reduced care quality. The study emphasizes the need for Kazakhstan and other nations to enhance leadership development programs, promote professional collaboration, and invest in leadership as a core element of healthcare. Future efforts should focus on evaluating leadership styles, training effectiveness, and cultural influences to build resilient, high-performing laboratory environments that adapt to changing healthcare demands.