Thymines opposite to bulky aristolactam-DNA adducts in duplex DNA are not targeted by human thymine-DNA glycosylase

PeerJ, 2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.7717/peerj.19577
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Background: results in the formation of bulky aristolactam-dA (dA-AL) and aristolactam-dG (dG-AL) adducts in cellular DNA ultimately leading to the development of urothelial cancer. Intriguingly, the dA-AL adducts induce A•T→T•A transversions in tumor cells preferentially in CpA*→TpG context. The human mismatch-specific thymine-DNA glycosylase (TDG) protects cells against mutagenesis induced by spontaneous deamination of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) by removing thymine opposite to guanine in a CpG context in the base excision repair (BER) pathway. Nevertheless, challenges for DNA glycosylases to the faithful discrimination between non-damaged and damaged DNA strands do exist, such as mismatched pairs between two canonical bases, which may result due to DNA polymerase errors during replication. Previously, we demonstrated that TDG is prone to aberrant excision of T opposite to damaged adenine in duplex DNA in CpA*/TpG context. Methods: reconstitution assays, we investigated whether TDG participates in the aberrant removal of thymine opposite to dA-AL adducts in duplex DNA. Results: We have demonstrated that TDG either does not excise thymine or does so with extremely low efficiency when it is paired with dA-AL or dG-ALII adducts in duplex DNA. At the same time, TDG excises with high efficiency thymine opposite to guanine and hypoxanthine in T•G and T•Hx mispairs. Discussion: These findings strongly suggest that the human TDG is not involved in the aberrant DNA repair of AA-induced DNA damage.