Machine Learning in Predicting the Performance of Acoustic Emission Signal Filtering Methods: Association Between Predictors

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/neuront66873.2025.11049968
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article presents the results of assessing the association between the quantitative values of the acoustic emission signal processing system predictors obtained at the output of digital filtering methods that were approximated based on the second-degree Butterworth and Bessel polynomials, as well as the Daubechies wavelet function of the eighth smoothness level. The measured values of the data processing system predictors based on the machine learning method - linear regression, were subjected to assessing their association. The association between the system predictors capable of determining, identifying and characterizing at the predictive analytics level the method that effectively processes noisy signals during filtering was also assessed. The regression analysis method revealed an association between the data processing system predictors associated with a simultaneous improvement in the system properties in terms of noise immunity and accuracy of acoustic emission signal processing in comparison with the Bessel filters and the Daubechies wavelet of the order in question. Moreover, the effectiveness of machine learning in assessing the relationship between predictors at a quantitative level is confirmed by calculating the correlation and determination coefficients and testing statistical significance.