Human Resource Management Configurations and Their Impact on Macroeconomic Indicators in Kazakhstan

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.47703/ejebs.v69i2.516
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Human resource management (hereinafter – HRM) has become a key factor in the adaptability of organisations in the context of instability. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between the types of organisational configurations in HRM and macroeconomic indicators in a hybrid institutional environment in Kazakhstan. The research methods employed include categorical coding of organisational characteristics, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), univariate analysis (ANOVA), and linear regression to assess the relationship between HRM configurations and GDP and employment indicators. The initial data covered the period from 2010 to 2024, including organisational characteristics of 26 small and medium-sized enterprises in Kazakhstan, as well as official industry statistics on GDP and employment, aggregated by four types of HRM configurations. The following key results were obtained: the HRM model in education and science demonstrated the most excellent effectiveness, having a significant impact on both GDP (F = 2369.3, p <0.001); the agricultural model showed a high correlation with employment (F = 116.99, p <0.001); the digital-creative model was significant only in terms of GDP (F = 109.4, p <0.001); the industrial hierarchical model showed the least impact on both indicators. These findings confirm that HRM models embedded in flexible, multifunctional structures with a development focus produce greater institutional and economic resilience. The study contributes to developing HRM typologies in transitional settings and offers evidence-based guidance for redesigning organisational systems aligned with sectoral performance and labor market priorities.