University-industry collaboration: Challenges, opportunities, and pathways to strengthen university governance and financial sustainability

2025

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1177/09504222251397490
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study examines university-industry collaboration (UIC) in Kazakhstan’s public universities, focusing on the challenges and opportunities that shape its potential to enhance university governance and diversify financial sustainability. Adopting a case study approach, the research involved elite interviews with 30 stakeholders, such as ministerial officials, senior management of universities, board members, and experts in higher education (HE). Unlike other studies that link weak UIC to low research capacity, this study finds that limited managerial experience impede collaboration even in a flagship national university with high research capacity, while teaching-oriented regional universities achieve comparatively greater success. However, the primary factor influencing these collaborations is regulatory compliance rather than genuine mutual interest, as legal mandates require subsoil companies to allocate funds to universities. Moreover, these obligations are often evaded by many companies, and local authorities lack the authority to enforce them. The study also revealed four key barriers to effective UIC: economic constraints, legal gaps in corporate regulation, the passive involvement of university board members, and insufficient leadership experience in stakeholder engagement.