Етістік негізді сөз тудырушы тұлғалардың этимологиясы

2025

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.71078/d5a9re23
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article examines the historical formation, semantic and functional features, as well as the etymology of the participial forms -ar, -er, -yr, -ir in Turkic languages. The usage of these affixes, their phonetic changes, and processes of semantic development in Turkic languages are analyzed in detail. Research findings indicate that these forms express not only tense meanings but also qualitative characteristics of objects. Additionally, the morphological features of participial forms in modern Turkic languages and their role in sentence structure are explored. Based on scholarly studies, the initial meanings of these forms in Old Turkic are compared with their modern meanings in Turkic languages. The study employs a historical-comparative method and provides an in-depth analysis of the grammatical function of participial affixes. Furthermore, the article examines the relationship between these affixes and dialectal variations in Turkic languages, providing an overview of their development patterns. The scope of participial forms in spoken language, folklore, and written literature is also discussed.