COVID-19 Pandemic-related Risk Factors of Depression: A 2-City Randomized Survey from Kazakhstan

Byron Lawrence Crape, Atanu Rakshit, Tansholpan Yakhiyayeva, Raushan Alibekova

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1017/dmp.2025.96
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psycho-social, economic, and biological factors on depression trajectories are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to determine the association of pandemic-related social and economic risk factors with depression. This baseline survey provides a foundation for the longitudinal panel study to assess the trajectory of psychopathologies and mental health resilience as the societal recovery from this pandemic occurs. Methods We telephonically surveyed 2000 randomly selected participants 18 years-and-older, stratified by 2 cosmopolitan cities in the high middle-income former-Soviet country of Kazakhstan. Survey-adjusted Poisson regression analyses produced probable depression (CESD-16) prevalence ratios (PRs) for COVID-19 death and disease, economic duress, and other socio-psychological factors. Results Household suspected having-or-diagnosed with COVID-19 with prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.48 (95% CI 1.09-2.02; P = 0·013), friends/coworkers diagnosed with COVD-19 with PR = 1.43 (1.04-1.95; P = 0.026), lost employment PR = 1.80 (1.04-3.11; P = 0.037), and insufficient income for food PR = 1.54 (1.15-2.06; P = 0.004) were independently associated with depression. Having COVID-19 deaths among family/friends or acquaintances/coworkers were not associated with depression, but family stress had a dose-response association, with PR = 13.42 (7.11-25.32; P < 0.001) for very high stress. Conclusions The study findings can inform future effective interventions and policies for protecting population mental health during and after extended periods of the pandemics.